We advise on decisions we have made ourselves.
Strategy, company structure, vehicles, software, organization, communication: we work with operators, founders, and municipalities on the full range of decisions that shape a shared mobility company. Our advice comes from having made these decisions with our own budget and our own shareholders.
Strategy, market entry, and expansion
Whether you are entering a market or rethinking one: which business model fits the city, free-floating or station-based, which vehicle mix, and what the unit economics look like before capital is committed.
Corporate structure and venture building
The company behind the operation: founding and shareholder structure, financing setup, and whether to build inside an existing organization, as a joint venture with a municipality or utility, or as an independent venture. We are not a law firm, and we work alongside your legal and tax advisors. What we know is which structures hold up in daily operation and which only look good on paper.
Vehicles and hardware
Which vehicles fit the use case, which telematics and locking hardware survives daily operation, what charging infrastructure the fleet actually needs. We are independent of manufacturers and receive no commissions
Software and data architecture
Which systems you need, in which order: booking, telematics, CRM, billing, maintenance. Including the question of where standard software is enough and where it pays to build.
Communication
A license to operate in shared mobility is negotiated: tenders, permits, city relations, public positioning. We have sat on the operator side of these negotiations.
Pilot projects and technology evaluation
Before you commit to a vehicle type, a pricing model, or a technology like predictive maintenance, we design a time-boxed test with defined scope and success criteria, and evaluate the results, including when the answer is stop.
Automation
A review of recurring workflows: which justify automation, which justify an agent, and which are fine as they are. Where implementation makes sense, we say what it takes. Where it does not, we say that too.
Advice in this industry fails in predictable places: a strategy that ignores unit economics, a company structure that blocks the next financing round, software that works in the demo but not in the depot. Our team brings 15 year of combined experience on both sides of these decisions: in the managing director role, answering to shareholders and city councils, and in the codebase, responsible for the systems the fleet runs on. We do not advise from case studies. We advise from consequences.
You bring one defined question. We agree on scope and a fixed price or day rate before we start. The result is a written assessment with a concrete recommendation, not a strategy deck. Most engagements run from a single workshop to a few weeks, remotely or on site.
If a topic turns into an implementation, that is a separate decision. Our agent implementations and TwinMantic are the natural next step. Nothing obliges you to take it.